Customer Comments

Load Balancer Comparison - A Refreshingly Simple Comparison of load balancing hardware specifications.

Load balancing appliances come in all sorts of shapes and sizes. Vendors can make comparing them a difficult task. This page aims to be a relativley un-biased source of comparison data.

We have concentrated on highlighting the realistic purchase price of units, support levels and any software restrictions that are in place on various models.

If you have any more information or factual corrections don't hesitate to let me know malcolm@loadbalancer.org


"What you're paying for is the fact that this appliance is tried tested and battle hardened on a lot of big web sites run by talented people who want results not marketing gimmicks"

Load Balancing Comparison - Hardware Appliances

Load Balancing - Leap of faith or comparison?Where can I find good quality Load Balancer infromation?

Well that depends if you want it to be biased or not. A lot of our comperitors have started setting up dodgy comparison sites highlighting their best features and ignoring the draw backs.

I'm not saying that I'm un-biased when it comes to load balancers I have a pretty strong opinion. But, as far as I'm aware the chart bellow is an accurate comparison of load balancing hardware, price, perfomrance and capability:

Loadbalancer.org, Barracuda, Kemp & CAI all use various flavours of LVS as their code base. Of these vendors Loadbalancer.org is the only one with strong UK support.

Barracuda, Kemp & CAI are based in California.

CoyotePoint is a long established brand, and a good quality product. It is a FreeBSD implementation with similar properties to LVS (but probably lower performance.). Support is completely through the channel, so varies with location. They are based in California.

Zeus & F5 are load balancing proxies (F5 also has switching and good layer 4 options). F5 is by far the best product on the market if you want an uber solution, good kernel code, good support, seriously expensive....

Zeus is perfectly good and has advanced layer 7 capability (same as F5) but its expensive not kernel based and therefore needs seriously powerful hardware to run at anywhere near decent speed.

Anyway onto the load balancing hardware comparison!:


Load Balancer Model
Warranty
Max Cons Throughput
RIPS
SSL
Price
Barracuda - 240
90 Days
n/a 95 Mbps
10
n/a £1,700
Barracuda - 340
90 Days
n/a 950 Mbps
35
150 £2,295
Barracuda - 440
90 Days n/a 950 Mbps
50
200 £4,421
Loadbalancer.org - ECO
90 Days 500K 100 Mbps
16
100 £1,495
Loadbalancer.org - ENTERPRISE
1 Year 3000K 1000 Mbps
Unlimited
150 £2,995
Loadbalancer.org - SLEDGEHAMMER
3 Years 7000K 1800 Mbps
Unlimited
200 £4,995
Kemp - 1500
1 Year
250K 100 Mbps
1000
100 £1,500
Kemp - 2500
1 Year
250K 350 Mbps
1000
1000 £3,400
Coyote - E250si
1 Year
100K 60 Mbps
16
n/a £2,550
Coyote - E350si
1 Year
2000K 775 Mbps
32
n/a £3,550
Coyote - E450si
1 Year
8000K 800 Mbps
128
n/a £4,700
CAI - 481s
3 Year
1400K 200 Mbps
65K
120 £2,500
CAI - 591sg
3 Year
1400K 1000 Mbps
65K
250 £3,700

You can make of this what you will, and no doubt we will get tons of emails from other vendors with small corrections etc.

If you have any more information or factual corrections don't hesitate to let me know malcolm@loadbalancer.org  ,Thanks.

.




 

 



About us    |    Products    |    Support    |    Download    |    F.A.Q    |    Contacts